9. PGE π♡ Re-Organize to Re-RePurpose their BK Bootstraps
Experiencing the Polarity of a Literal, in Mathematical Logic, the Proof of Theory lies in the Resolution. We must Simply Begin with the End in Mind.
Let us Begin with the Laws of Compensation (Structuralism(biology)) and Mass Action which can assist us in identifying the next steps to understanding our Human Capital and how to Re-Work the Mindfulness of our Planet for the next 100 years with Collective Effervescence.
Christine Cerda
Excerpts from Wikipedia...
Geoffroy's Law of Compensation[edit]
Experiencing the Polarity of a Literal, in Mathematical Logic, the Proof of Theory lies in the Resolution. We must Simply Begin with the End in Mind.
Let us Begin with the Laws of Compensation (Structuralism(biology)) and Mass Action which can assist us in identifying the next steps to understanding our Human Capital and how to Re-Work the Mindfulness of our Planet for the next 100 years with Collective Effervescence.
Christine Cerda
Excerpts from Wikipedia...
Geoffroy's Law of Compensation[edit]
In 1830, Γtienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire argued a structuralist case against the functionalist (teleological) position of Georges Cuvier. Geoffroy believed that homologies of structure between animals indicated that they shared an ideal pattern; these did not imply evolution but a unity of plan, a law of nature.[b] He further believed that if one part was more developed within a structure, the other parts would necessarily be reduced in compensation, as nature always used the same materials: if more of them were used for one feature, less was available for the others.[3]
In chemistry, since 1864, the law of mass action is the proposition that the rate of a chemical reaction is directly proportional to the product of the activities or concentrations of the reactants.[1] It explains and predicts behaviors of solutions in dynamic equilibrium. Specifically, it implies that for a chemical reaction mixture that is in equilibrium, the ratio between the concentration of reactants and products is constant.[2]
Sociophysics[29] uses tools and concepts from physics and physical chemistry to describe some aspects of social and political behavior. It attempts to explain why and how humans behave much like atoms, at least in some aspects of their collective lives. The law of mass action (generalized if it is necessary) is the main tool to produce the equation of interactions of humans in sociophysics.
Mass action in sociology refers to the situations where numerous people behave simultaneously in a similar way but individually and without coordination.
In neuroscience, the mass action principle suggests that the proportion of the brain that is injured is directly proportional to the decreased ability of memory functions.[1] In other words, memory cannot be localized to a single cortical area, but is instead distributed throughout the cortex. This theory is contrasted by functional specialization. This is one of two principles that Karl Lashley published in 1950, alongside the equipotentiality principle.
Currently mass action principle is accepted as a mechanism for some functions within the brain. However, there have been some functions that are believed to be contained within specific areas of the brain (many related to speech, which was impossible to determine when the mass action principle was theorized, as experiments historically only used animals). It does not appear that this difference is determined by difficulty of the function, as some highly specialized tasks are localized.
Collective effervescence (CE) is a sociological concept coined by Γmile Durkheim. According to Durkheim, a community or society may at times come together and simultaneously communicate the same thought and participate in the same action. Such an event then causes collective effervescence which excites individuals and serves to unify the group.[1]
Comments
Post a Comment